Election analysis: progressives retain narrow edge
Bob Wells | Nov 5, 2009
I awoke this morning to find Boulder a little less of a special place than it was yesterday.
That’s because in the mail-in City Council election that ended with into-the-night vote-counting Tuesday, Oct. 3, voters chose – along with predictably returning three incumbents to office – to fill the remaining two contested Council seats with relatively unprogressive candidates.
The nine-member Council that’s to be sworn into office Nov. 17 will thus reflect a sharply divided city, with the real progressives holding a tenuous 5-4 majority – tenuous because one of the five, current Mayor Matt Appelbaum, is given to deep analytical musings whose outcome is sometimes a surprise.(See larger version of chart)
The solid foursome I’m calling the true progressives – Macon Cowles (reelected this week) plus incumbents Crystal Gray, Lisa Morzel and Susan Osborne – are what corporate media would probably label radical environmental activists, a phrase that sounds as sweet to me as tupelo honey. They take global climate change seriously; they’re serious about curbing pollution from cars and coal-burning power plants; they dislike real estate profiteers.
The two newcomers
Newly elected were George Karakehian, a downtown merchant, a registered Republican, and a guy who made no secret during his big-spending campaign, blasting it out in postcards, public appearances and recorded robocalls, that he hates the leftie extremism he sees on the Council. On election night, he told a reporter, ominously, “I hope we can get back to some reasonable decisions on City Council.” Gulp.

Election night: Elizabeth Allen and Larry Bingham watch the returns at progressives' gathering at Hotel Boulderado (Reporter photo)
Both ran highly professional campaigns – so smooth, in fact, that progressives raised questions about whether they had hired pros had run them, what they were paid, and whether legal spending limits had been adhered to. (Note to self: investigate.)
In electing the two, voters passed up two candidates, Tim Plass and Jyotsna Raj, who had gained endorsements from two environmental groups, the Sierra Club and PLAN-Boulder County. Over many a year, these groups’ endorsements have been viewed as instrumental in election victories by left-leaning candidates.
An unusual alliance
A rather bizarre feature of the election was how the conservative bloc of candidates gained support not only from real estate interests but also from groups promoting outdoor recreation on city-owned trails and open space (including the Boulder Outdoor Coalition, Boulder Mountainbike Alliance and, yes, Friends Interested in Dogs and Open Space). In newspaper ads and flyers, business and recreation groups both endorsed the same candidates. There they were, business folks and athletes, side-by-side on election night at the Boulder Draft House. Strange.
One progressive spoke despondently of this alliance, calling them, collectively, “me-tarians.” Both groups, she noted, use libertarian, less-government rhetoric; but the actual goal of both, she added, is freedom to pursue self-interest – real estate lucre in one case and, in the other, indulgence of a sometimes pathological involvement with the “high” and/or the big business of outdoor recreation. Does this alliance constitute an “only in Boulder” moment? Maybe not quite.
The shifting makeup of a City Council is perhaps not an earthshaking story. But it’s a microcosm for something bigger, something national and indeed global. It’s the tension between those who would doggedly cling to business as usual and those who realize we’ve got mega-crises coming at us – environmental, economic, political.
City’s climate initiative
As incumbent Council member Crystal Gray noted on election night, the progressive majority on the Council started listening about five years ago to the message of groups like Climate Action Network. They responded with a series of initiatives both educational and, more recently, action-oriented:
– Boulder and Boulder County teamed up for ClimateSmart, a serious attempt to spread the word about climate change and to chart local response strategies.
– In 2006, Boulder enacted the nation’s first city “carbon tax” to fund action to curb greenhouse-gas emissions.
– The Council then got serious about promoting alternative transportation by expanding bikepaths, helping citizens plan bike trips using the Web and, most recently, planning a Transit Village to serve as a central hub for bike, bus and hoped-for future passenger train traffic. The promotion has helped produce a usage rate for bus, bike and walking transportation of 28 percent — three times the national average.
– Most recently, they’ve embarked on a “Sustainable Streets and Centers” initiative (PDF document), aimed at making major urban corridors more walkable and bikeable, with future residential construction to be channeled into these corridors.
Cowles targeted
All these initiatives have proved a bit scary for those still debating whether climate change is for real, or whether it requires radical action. These elements saw in Macon Cowles – an attorney who’s quite famous for taking on corporate interests – as Enemy Number One in the election. Removing him would have been a big victory, probably tipping the Council to a 5-4 business-boosting majority.
That effort failed. Noted one observer at the progressives’ election night party at the Hotel Boulderado mezzanine: “They went after Macon with both guns and didn’t knock him off.” As the vote tally progressed Tuesday night, Cowles even inched ahead from a fifth-place finish, which would have gained him only a two-year seat, to fourth place, a four-year term.
As the evening wore on at the Boulderado, the mood among progressives brightened (see picture). The new Council promises to be contentious, and likely to divide 4-to-4 on many key votes. The somewhat mercurial Appelbaum, who’s likely to be reelected Mayor by his colleagues when the Council is seated Nov. 17, should prove a reasonably reliable fifth vote.
The dike held. Those low-profile Boulder lefties (whom I’ve written about before) made their appearance again. Boulder’s legendary progressives – none the younger and likely to face future challenges from those often misleadingly called “centrists” – are still in control.
Pro-business slate. These yard signs promoting the relatively conservative Council candidates bedecked many a Boulder yard. (Reporter photo)
Other articles by Bob Wells
- Flagstaff tree thinning: threat level still high - May 20th, 2011
- Is the tree-thinning orgy winding down yet? - May 16th, 2011
- Why we cancelled all the newspapers - March 25th, 2011
- Dogs versus cats - March 8th, 2011
- Elk in the shadow of Red Rocks - March 8th, 2011
- Getting ready for collapse with "food localization" - March 1st, 2011
- Live coverage from Cairo - January 28th, 2011
- World enviro-day draws scant Boulder crowd - October 11th, 2010
- A sun-splashed bash to dedicate CU's big new Visual Arts Complex - September 24th, 2010
- Weekend of thanks - September 19th, 2010



Glad to see you see it that way–I didn't like the way the progressives drove a wedge between themselves and moderates like me during this last election cycle. My view is that the so called "progressives" have alienated those of us who like to mountain bike as well as hike, who have dogs, who want to see more trails on more of our publically owned open space, and who want to be able to expand our own homes reasonably–but who also dislike real estate-profiteers and speculators, are ardent environmentalists, and take reducing our carbon footprints seriously.
I agree with the "progressives" on some things but I am tired of being pilloried as an anti-environmentalist corporate shill when I say want to ride my mountain bike in a few more trails on a few more of our public lands, or when I mention that I might want to build an art studio over my detached garage someday. That's why I voted against most of the progressive slate this time around. Tone down your rhetoric and you might make some allies–not all of us liberals are evil "conservatives".
In answer to your suggestion, Martin, I got this reply to my inquiry to Hillary Hall's office (she's the County Clerk and Recorder):
"Currently, the unofficial turnout for the 2009 Coordinated Election is about 34 percent. The 2007 Coordinated Election had a turnout of about 41 percent. There are some ballots that could still be counted for the 2009 Coordinated Election. This includes ballots that require a voter to resolve their signature or provide a photocopy of ID. Voters have until Thursday, November 12 to do so. Additionally, the election results will not be official until the canvass board certifies the results. The deadline to certify election results is Friday, November 20. Election results can be viewed at http://www.VoteBoudler.org." — Source: Jessie Cornelius at the Boulder County Clerk & Recorder’s Office.
It would be worth knowing what percentage of the electorate voted and how it breaks down in comparison to prior off-year elections.
I think out-reach to the mountain-bikers and dog fanciers would be much smarter than making fun of them. We shouldn't let their concerns become wedge issues in classic Rovian fashion. They're natural allies for progressive positions.
[...] Bob Wells at the Boulder Reporter has a thoughtful and well-written analysis of the Boulder election results here. [...]
At the movies
Movies now playing at local theatres (with Rotten Tomatoes ratings) Link
Get alerts about new articles
Browse past content
Facebook Fans
If you're on Facebook, wanna "Like" us?
Readership
Boulder Reporter was viewed by 26,189 unique visitors during Jan-Dec, 2010. (Source: Google Analytics)
Become a Sponsor
Switch to our mobile site
Contact Us | Powered by WordPress | Log in |